At the end of the OPE4 period, the LFM of the project was revised. The results levels were crosscut to present the linkages of the different components and to measure benefit of each component to one another. This approach was in line with findings and recommendations of the Mid-Term Review (MTR) and a ROM mission.
The results were narrowed down to three main results to encompass the aspects of economic and social development. They are (i) Economic Development is promoted through increased primary agricultural production, (ii) Economic Development is promoted and HH revenue is complemented through the value-added agricultural produce and through other non-agricultural activities, (iii) Social Development is promoted. The three results and the achievements against the specific indicators are shown below.
| RESULTS |
Objectively Verifiable
Indicators |
Present |
Target after
16 Nov 2007 |
Source of
Verification |
| C.1 Economic Development is promoted through increased Primary agricultural production |
| 1.1. Preconditions for agricultural production are improved |
| 1.1.1 – Land titles are issued to farmers(Related activities 5.2) |
· Nr Land Titles issued for private beneficiaries |
42,214 |
42 000 land titles |
CONTRACT MLMUPC, QIPs |
| · Nr Land Titles issued: breakdown per sex |
Male: 13%
Female: 24%/
Common property: 50% |
|
CONTRACT MLMUPC |
| · Nr Land Titles issued: breakdown per income level |
Very low income hh: 98%
Low income hh100% |
|
BASELINE (Q.1.4 – in 7 villages where Land titling is completed) |
| 1.1.2 – Availability of Credit to finance Agricultural production is improved(Related activities 2.5) |
· Nr of loans granted for agricultural production |
Nr: 9,445 clients/ 63% |
(agri+business loans): 8000 clients |
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Amount of loans granted for agricultural production |
Amount: 11,508,675,545 R/ 56% |
> 50% |
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Breakdown access to credit per sex |
Male: Nr 62% / Amount: 55%
Female: Nr 28% / Amount: 45% |
65% women |
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Breakdown access to credit per income level |
Very low: Nr 8.5%% / Amount: NA%Low income: Nr 18.5% / Amount: NA % |
|
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · % hh use formal credit |
Before: 26.2%
After: 37% |
|
BASELINE (Q.7) |
| · % hh declare using formal credit more than before |
20% |
|
BASELINE (Q.7) |
| 1.1.3 – Availability of seeds & plants is improved(Related activities 1.6) |
· Nr Seed producers associations supported (A-B qualitative ranking) |
6 |
1 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Quantity of improved quality rice seeds produced (tone) |
300 |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr Fruit trees nurseries supported (A-B ranking) |
4 |
4 |
Contract SRE KHMER, ALF Technical reports |
| · Nr seedlings produced |
10000 |
|
Contract SRE KHMER, ALF Technical reports |
| 1.1.4 – Preconditions for animal production are improved(Related activities 1.6) |
· Nr COLPOG functional (A-B ranking) |
90 |
36 |
CONTRACT ADDA, M4 |
| · Nr young animals distributed through COLPOG activity |
Piglets:450/0/450
Chicks: 2970/0/2,970
Ducks: 1309/0/1,170
Cattle: 136/0/136 |
|
CONTRACT ADDA, M4 |
| · Nr Animal Feed Production Centres established |
6 |
9 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Animal feed production per year |
Pig feed (all types): 200
Poultry feed (all types): 0 |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr Village Animal Health Workers supported |
152 |
200 |
STATS |
| 1.1.5 – Preconditions for fish production are improved(Related activities 1.6, 3.2) |
· Nr Fish hatcheries/nurseries established [1] |
Hatcheries: 3
Nurseries: 6 |
Hatchery: 3
Nursery: 6 |
ALF Technical reports |
| · Production of fish hatcheries/nurseries per year |
Fry:440,000
Fingerlings: 2,000,000 |
|
ALF Technical reports |
| 1.1.6 – Technical training & support is provided to farmers(Related activities 1.1, 1.8, 1.5) |
· Nr of staff of line Departments trained/ Nr trainees days |
269/538 |
270 |
CONTRACT ICON |
| · Average qualitative result |
21% improvement pre/post tests |
|
CONTRACT ICON |
| · Nr of IRDM farmers trained/ Nr trainees days |
1800 PFs / 68,360 trainee days |
1800 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr field days organised |
181 |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr farmers visits organised |
77 |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr demo plots organised |
90[2] |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| 1.1.7 – Irrigation schemes are created or upgraded(Related activities 1.9) |
· Nr of irrigation schemes rehabilitated |
8[3] |
9 |
RIS reports |
| · Increase in command area |
Before: 1 219 haAfter:2593 ha |
1200 |
RIS reports |
| · 2010 irrigated area cropped |
2593 ha (not include Tavong Plov Chrov Irrigation) |
|
RIS reports |
| · Nr of water users (hh) served |
1,748 |
|
RIS reports |
| 1.2. Primary agricultural production is intensified & diversified |
· Nr of pilot IRDM farmers supported |
1,800 |
1800 |
CONTRACT ADDA
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · Nr of modernised farmers in 2010 including first year dissemination |
3,893 |
2800 |
CONTRACT ADDA
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · 2010 cumulated rice production increase |
3,150 tons 31% |
25% |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2010 cumulated secondary food crops production increase [4] |
___ tons __% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2010 cumulated fish production increase |
86kg /pond tons 31.77 tones |
45kg/pond, > 80 tons fish production |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2010 cumulated meat production increase |
5.33% |
20% |
CONTRACT ADDA
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · ha under intensified vegetable production (M4) |
11 ha increase (15-26 ha) |
>10 ha increase |
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · area under home vegetable gardens in IRDM hh |
22.01ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr of female IRDM farmers |
M1:24%
M2:28%
M3:41%
M4:33%
Overall: _32 % |
30% |
CONTRACT ADDA
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · Nr of low-income IRDM farmers |
M1:18%
M2:28%
M3:13%
M4:4%
Overall: 37% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
CONTRACT VAKAKIS
BASELINE (Q.5) |
| 1.2.1. Lowland rainfed farming systems (M1) are intensified and diversified(Related activities 1.2) |
· Nr of pilot IRDM farmers supported |
860 |
860 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr of modernised farmers in 2010 including first year dissemination |
1,763 |
1,935 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Primary adoption rate with IRDM farmers |
50% |
50% on average |
BASELINE (Q 8.4)
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Maximum/ average yield for rain-fed and floating rice by IRDM farmers |
Max 4 t/ha, Avg 3.3 t/ha |
2.4 t/ha |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 rice production increase |
Area planted 1,330 ha
Expected production 2,904 tons 440 % |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Projected impact: 2015 expected rice production increase [5] |
52,074 tons 9,588% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
Project estimates |
| · 2010 ha of cash crops grown as secondary crops |
32.92 ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2010 area under home vegetable gardens in IRDM hh |
4.02ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 growth rate of livestock herds |
Expected colpog output___
poultry 3 %
pig 6 %
cattle 8 % |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
STATS Animal Production |
|
|
| · 2007-2010 meat production increase |
NA tons 5.33 % |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 fish production increase [6] |
14.43 tons __% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
STATS Animal Production |
| 1.2.2. Irrigated farming systems (M2) are intensified and diversified(Related activities 1.3) |
· Nr of pilot IRDM farmers supported |
420 |
420 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr of modernised farmers in 2010 including first year dissemination |
861 |
945 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Primary adoption rate with IRDM farmers |
60% |
50% on average |
BASELINE (Q 8.4)
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr of ha under irrigated cultivation |
Full control (2 crops/yr): 415 ha
Partial control of water (1 crop): 2,593 ha |
1,200 ha of irrigated rice |
RIS reports
SURVEY: RIS impact study |
| · Maximum/ average yield for irrigated rice by IRDM farmers |
Max 4 t/ha, Avg 3.5 t/ha |
3.2 t/ha |
CONTRACT ADDA
SURVEY: RIS impact study |
| · Maximum/ average yield for rain-fed by IRDM farmers |
Max 4 t/ha |
2.4 t/ha |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 rice production increase |
Area planted 2,593 ha
Expected production 9075.5 tons |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Projected impact: 2015 expected rice production increase [7] |
29820 tons 11260% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
Project estimates |
| · 2010 ha of cash crops grown as secondary crops [8] |
___ ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2010 area under home vegetable gardens in IRDM hh |
2.6 ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 growth rate of livestock herds [9] |
Expected colpog output___
poultry __%
pig __%
cattle __% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
STATS Animal Production |
|
|
| · 2007-2010 meat production increase [10] |
___ tons 5.33 % |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 fish production increase [11] |
Expected production 8.83 tons NA% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| 1.2.3. Upland farming systems (M3) are intensified and diversified(Related activities 1.4) |
· Nr of pilot IRDM farmers supported |
400 |
400 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Nr of modernised farmers in 2010 including first year dissemination |
820 |
900 |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Primary adoption rate with IRDM farmers |
50% |
50% on average |
BASELINE (Q 8.4)
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Maximum/ average yield for rain-fed by IRDM farmers |
Max 4.2 t/ha, Avg 3.8 t/ha |
2 t/ha |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 rice production increase |
Area planted 420 ha
Expected production1,470 tons 460 % |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Projected impact: 2015 expected rice production increase [12] |
26,705 tons 10,073% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
Project estimates |
| · 2007-2010 other food crops production increase [13] |
Expected yield Avg 2.2 t/ha |
40% |
CONTRACT ADDA |
| (maize/soya beans/mung beans/groundnuts/sweet potatoes) |
Area planted 31.69 ha |
|
Expected production 72.68 tons NA % |
|
|
| · 2010 ha of fodder crops grown[14] |
2.66ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2010 area under home vegetable gardens in IRDM hh |
2.2 ha |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 growth rate of livestock herds [15] |
Expected colpog output___
poultry __%
pig __%
cattle __% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
STATS Animal Production |
|
|
| · 2007-2010 meat production increase [16] |
___ tons 5.33 % |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · 2007-2010 fish production increase |
Expected production 4.75 tons NA% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| 1.2.4. Vegetable production (M4) is intensified and diversified(Related activities 2.3) |
· Nr of pilot IRDM farmers supported [17] |
120 |
120 |
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · Nr of modernised farmers in 2010 including first year dissemination |
422 |
270 |
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · ha under intensified vegetable production in 2010 |
7 ha increase (19-26 ha) |
>10 ha increase |
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · Primary adoption rate with IRDM farmers |
78% |
50% on average |
BASELINE (Q 8.4)
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · range of yield increase (Min/ Max) for 5 main vegetable productions |
Expected yield Avg ___ t/ha
Min: ___%
Max: ___%
- 14T/ha for Tomato
- 11T/ha for Cucumber
-
20T/ha for Cabbage
-
7T/ha for Cauliflower
-
11T/ha for Yard long bean |
8.5t/ha for tomato and 18t/ha for cucumber |
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · range of unit prices increase (Min/ Max) for 5 main vegetable productions |
Expected Price index 100%
Min: 206 %
Max: 466% |
|
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · 2007-2010 estimated added value increase for vegetable production |
324% |
|
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · 2007-2010 growth rate of livestock herds |
Expected colpog output:
poultry 1.3 %
pig 2.39% |
|
CONTRACT VAKAKIS
STATS Animal Production |
|
| · 2007-2010 meat production increase [18] |
___ tons __% |
|
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
|
|
|
|
| C.2 Economic Development is promoted and HH revenue is complemented through the valorisation of Agricultural produce and through other non-agricultural activities |
| 2.1. Preconditions for diversification: Credit is available to finance on-farm/off-farm diversification activities(Related activities 2.5) |
· Nr micro-credit branches functional in target area |
16 |
16 |
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Nr of loans granted per destination |
Agriculture 9,445/84%
Productive investments/enterprise creation: 1,374/ 12%
Consumption: 422/ 4% |
(agri+business loans): 8000 clients |
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Amount of loans granted per destination |
Agriculture: 11,508 MR / 56%
Productive investments/ enterprise creation: 7,556 MR/ 37%
Consumption: 1,605 MR / 8% |
|
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Breakdown access to credit per sex |
Male: Nr 67 % / Amount: 47%
Female: Nr 33% / Amount: 53% |
|
CONTRACT PRASAC |
| · Breakdown access to credit per income level |
Very low: Nr 8.5%% / Amount: NA%
Low income: Nr 18.5% / Amount: NA % |
|
BALELINE (Q.7) |
| · % hh use formal credit |
Before: 21%
After: 37% |
|
BASELINE (Q.7) |
| · % hh declare using formal credit more than before |
20% |
|
BASELINE (Q.7) |
| · Nr of savings accounts opened |
7,160 |
8000 |
CONTRACT PRASAC
BASELINE (Q.7) |
| 2.2. Value-chain of agricultural production is valorised for fruits & veg(Related activities 2.3) |
· Range of unit prices increase (Min/ Max) for 5 main vegetable productions |
Expected Price index 100%
Min: 206 %
Max: 466% |
|
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| · 2007-2010 estimated added value increase for vegetable production |
324% |
|
CONTRACT VAKAKIS |
| 2.3. Silk production is developed(Related activities 2.2) |
· Nr hh active in silk production |
Breeders: 320
Weavers: 97 |
330 breeders/ 90 weavers |
CONTRACT CEFP |
| · 2007-2010 Increase silk production |
1002.51 kg |
|
CONTRACT CEFP |
| · Employment generated |
Total:435 Women: 433 |
|
CONTRACT CEFP |
| · Average revenue generated per person/year |
Breeders: 107 USD
Weavers: 136 USD |
|
CONTRACT CEFP |
| 2.4. Fish processing is developed(Related activities 2.4) |
· Nr of demo groups established |
56 |
56 |
CONTRACT CADTIS |
| · Nr of groups members involved in sustainable groups |
406 |
|
CONTRACT CADTIS |
| · Production of sustainable groups |
9,200 kg fish processed
3,600 kg prahoc produced |
|
CONTRACT CADTIS |
| · Turnover of sustainable groups |
7 kg prahoc auto consumed
10-39 USD value of sales/member |
|
CONTRACT CADTIS |
| 2.5. Creation of micro-enterprises in craft industries & service activities is encouraged(Related activities 2.1) |
· Nr of youth created their own activity 1 year after vocational training completion |
316/ 52% |
|
CONTRACT ABU |
| · Breakdown per activity |
Beauty 79%
Hospitality 80%
Construct 88%
Driver 16%
Mechanics 63%
Electronics 57%
Farming 16% |
|
CONTRACT ABU |
| · Nr of loans granted for enterprise creation |
1,374 |
|
CONTRACT PRASAC |
|
|
|
|
| C.3 Social Development is promoted |
| 3.1. Socio-economic infrastructures are upgraded |
| 3.1.1. Access roads are upgraded(Related activities 4.2) |
· km of rural roads created/ rehabilitated |
155.98 km |
155.8 km rehabilitated |
RIS reports |
| · Nr population served |
113,263 people |
|
STATS (population of village served) |
| 3.1.2. Village halls are constructed |
· Nr village halls constructed |
90 VCHs |
90 |
ALF/RIS reports |
| 3.2. HH sanitary conditions are upgraded |
· National Health status indicator(s) |
Before: ___% |
|
STATS (Min.of Health)
UNICEF |
| (Nb: to be defined) |
After: ___% |
| · % hh judge their health status has improved |
35% |
> 10% |
BASELINE (Q.6.2) |
| 3.2.1. Access to clean potable water is improved(Related activities 4.1) |
· Nr of potable water sources improved |
· Rainwater jar: 1309
· Hand dug well: 60
· Combination well: 82
· Pond: 8 |
-1,934 Rainwater Jars
-74 hand dug wells
-17 combination wells
-15 drilled wells
-7 Village ponds |
RIS reports |
| · Nr population served |
22,594 people |
|
RIS reports |
| 3.2.2. Latrines are created(Related activities 4.1) |
· Nr latrines built |
6,694 latrine |
-6,197 Latrines |
RIS reports |
| · Nr population served |
34,072 people |
|
RIS reports |
| 3.2.3. HH health awareness is increased(Related activities 3.4) |
· Nr hh receive health awareness training |
90 villages |
|
CONTRACT ICON |
| · % hh aware about health/ child care |
74% |
|
BASELINE (Q.6.1) |
| 3.3. Community-based organisations & community empowerment are promoted |
| 3.3.1. Community-based Organisations are promoted & supported(Related activities 1.7, 3.3) |
· Nr of CBO assisted |
335 CBOs – out of which:
· ColPog 90
· Community fisheries 5
· Feed center association 6
· FWUCs 8
· Mine &UXO committee 40
· Mushroom growing 1
· Prahoc making group 56
· Rice seed association 6
· RRUC 24
· Silk producers 19
· Vegetable Producer Group 2 2
· WSUG 66 |
|
CONTRACT ADDA |
| · Villagers aware of CBO |
Before: 43 %
After: 88% |
|
BASELINE (Q.9) |
| · Qualitative assessment of CBO Empowerment & Sustainability Status |
A (strong sustainability): 41 %
B (good sustainability): 58 %
C (started sustainability):1%
D (sustainability still poor):0% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
SURVEY CGR/ EIC |
| 3.3.2. Communities are empowered for local development planning & implementation of national D&D policy(Related activities 3.1) |
· Nr of Commune Councils trained |
40 |
40 |
CONTRACT ICON |
| · Local community empowerment indicator |
- Percentage of villagers declare having at least one villagers/farmers org. in commune Before: 44.2%, After: 88%
- Percentage of villagers declare having heard about CDP Before: 36.3%, After: 64%
- Percentage of villagers declare having participated in CDP process Before: 23.7%, After: 61% |
sensibly improved (>5%) |
BASELINE (Q.10.1-2) |
|
| · Qualitative assessment of Commune Councils Empowerment Status |
A (strong sustainability): 41 %
B (good sustainability): 58 %
C (started sustainability):1%
D (sustainability still poor):0% |
|
CONTRACT ICON
SURVEY EIC |
| 3.4. Women are empowered and gender-specific activities are promoted(horizontal activities) |
· Average women empowerment indicator |
- Percentage of villagers declare being aware of activities related to women in commune Before: 47%, After:60%
- Percentage of women been consultated for the CDP Before: 15.8%, After:32% |
sensibly improved (>5%) |
BASELINE (Q.11) |
|
| · Qualitative assessment of level of women empowerment in Community affairs at village level |
A (strong): 0.3 %
B (Medium): 49.1%
C (Poor):50.7% |
|
CONTRACT GAD-C
SURVEY GAD-C |
|
| · Qualitative assessment of level of women empowerment in household affairs at individual level |
A (strong):13.63 %
B (Medium): 43.5%
C (Poor): 36.3% |
|
CONTRACT GAD-C
SURVEY GAD-C |
|
|
|
| · % illiterate adult females in target provinces |
Before: 12%
After: 10% |
|
STATS (Commune dBase) |
| · Nr of women among IRDM Farmers |
29% |
|
CONTRACT ADDA
SURVEY GAD-C |
| · Nr of women receiving Land Titles |
74% |
|
CONTRACT MLMUPC
SURVEY GAD-C |
| · Nr of women received loan from PRASAC following Project's support |
33% |
|
CONTRACT PRASAC
SURVEY GAD-C |
| · Nr of women found jobs/or started revenue generating activity following Project's support |
41% |
|
CONTRACT
ABU
CONTRACT PRASAC
SURVEY GAD-C |
| 3.5. Youth are trained through vocational training(Related activities 2.1) |
· Youth unemployment rate in target villages |
Before: 5.3%
After: 4.8% |
|
STATS (Commune dBase) |
| Seasonal migration rate in target villages |
- Percentage of family members working off-farm less than 4 months Before: 60.3%, After: 45%
- Among those having a family member working off-farm, % of them getting off-farm jobs in the same commune Before: 19.1%, After: 7% |
|
STATS (Commune dBase)
BASELINE (Q.3) |
| · Nr of youth trained |
1,812 Breakdown per age class/ curriculum |
|
CONTRACT ABU/QIPs |
| · % of youth found a job/ created their job |
After 1 year: 46%
Target: 70% |
50% |
CONTRACT ABU |
| 3.6. Villagers awareness & literacy is promoted(Related activities 3.4) |
2. Nr of villagers trained |
Literacy:
3-6 years : 818
12-16 years: 160
17-20 years: 360
21-40 years: 723
>40 years: 21 |
1,200 |
Project data |
| 3.7. Post-war consequences are alleviated by addressing mine-risk reduction |
| 3.7.1. Mines are cleared in selected areas(Related activities 5.1) |
· Area cleared |
513 ha |
400 ha |
CONTRACT CMAC |
| · Land cleared reclaimed for productive use in 2010 |
95% |
|
CONTRACT CMAC |
| 3.7.2. Mine victims situation is alleviated(Related activities 5.1) |
· Nr of mine victims trained by ABU |
125 + 180 |
120 + 180 mine victims |
CONTRACT ABU + QIPS |
| · % of mine victims found a job/ created their job |
After 1 year:83 % |
70% |
CONTRACT ABU |
| 3.7.3. Continued mine awareness is promoted(Related activities 5.1) |
· Nr school children trained for continued mine awareness |
20,651 (10,700F) students |
20,000 |
CONTRACT MoEYS |
| · Average score of school children trained for continued mine awareness |
Grade A (53%) |
|
CONTRACT MoEYS |
| · Nr of events for Land Tenure/Mine risk reduction awareness |
26road shows
107 hr radio broadcasting
Breakdown per type |
14 Road shows
107 hr radio broadcasting |
CONTRACT EWMI |
|
| · % villagers declaring having hear information messages |
89% |
|
CONTRACT EWMI
BASELINE (Q.12) |
