Key Indicators |
Statement |
Relevance |
Appropriateness with the government policy related to Poverty Alleviation
Adequacy to the local context of search for food security, employment opportunities and gender mainstreaming in society as cross-cutting issue
Responsive to institutional support to good local governance |
Efficiency |
By calling upon specialized contractors, the project strongly expects high quality service at reasonable cost
Melting-pot of human resources from diverse institutions ensures delivery of competence
In the context of inflation of price, some delays of contract implementation likely impact on efficiency |
Effectiveness |
Overall, the trends show good progress toward satisfactory achievement of the objective
Some activity gaps due to unsuccessful tendering contracts are very likely to effects the full achievement of livelihood improvement of recipients
The intervention logic to deal with critical issues is interactive and participatory through involvement of line ministries and other stakeholders |
Impact |
Quality and pertinent identification of the needs of vulnerable beneficiaries through baseline survey ensures adequate technical responses
The project contributes to revitalize the private sector and to strengthen self-confidence and sense of ownership of local governance
But the high number of contractors leads to monitoring gaps that may jeopardize the quality of service delivered |
Sustainability |
Introduction of mechanisms of ownership and increased responsibility via policy of hand-over of assets to local authorities and CBOs
Introduction of technology that is replicable thanks to simple possibility of repair and maintenance, or agricultural extension
Respect of local and ethnic values and culture allows durable optimization of technology introduced |
